Grasping the Central Thesis of New Testament Hope or How We Specialize in Asking the Wrong Questions
October 16, 2008 by keas“The important thing is that we grasp the central hope of the ultimate resurrection, set within new creation itself, and that we reorder all our thinking and speaking about every other after-death question in that light.” (Surprised by Hope, 174)
This simple statement helps me see questions of the afterlife in a new light. When reading a book it’s much more important to grasp the thesis, the author’s underlying argument, than details or specifics of its chapters and passages. When watching a play it’s much more important to catch the plot, the storyline that is pushing the play along, than one scene or a dialogue within the play. In a way this describes the importance of grasping the hope of resurrection in the New Testament compared to other afterlife issues. This is not to say the other details are not important such as the intermediate state between death and resurrection, the realities of heaven and hell, etc. These specifics are important, for together they must constitute a coherent whole. However, it would be a grave mistake to weigh these after-death details with the same heaviness as the great after-death question the New Testament is concerned with: resurrection. Maybe we’ve been asking the wrong questions. Where will we go? What will it be like? Will I still be married? Come to think of it, we’re pretty good at asking the wrong questions. Wright says the question ought to be, “How will God’s new creation come?” and then, “How will we humans contribute to that renewal of creation and to the fresh projects that the creator God will launch in his new world?” (185). Resurrection and new creation are at the center, the very core, of Christian hope; they’re the plot holding the play together. And understanding the plot of a play is the first step in making sense of its smaller scenes.
Why not end this post with another Wright quote, one just as robust as the first:
“But the most important thing to say at the end of this discussion, and of this section of the book, is that heaven and hell are not, so to speak, what the whole game is about. This is one of the central surprises in the Christian hope. The whole point of my argument so far is that the question of what happens to me after death is not the major, central, framing question that centuries of theological tradition have supposed. The New Testament, true to its Old Testament roots, regularly insists that the major, central, framing question is that of God’s purpose of rescue and re-creation for the whole world, the entire cosmos.” (184)
Nat King Cole
Keas, I enjoyed your blog on asking the wrong questions, I especially like the last quote, it helps explain our need to focus on the central theme, which is God’s Ultimate purpose and promise to the world. I completely agree that we are accustom to asking the wrong questions when it comes to difficult problems in life ,but ,we also constantly ask the wrong questions when addressing our daily life, which we assume to be the easier questions, with easy answers. We rush right through them without thinking about what is really happening, we forget the plot or basis of what is ultimately the purpose. But as for the after-death questions, do we really need answers to those questions, or are they there to just sit there and speculate?( I am referring to the question you proposed, “How will we humans contribute to that renewal of creation and to the fresh projects that the creator God will launch in his new world?”)
The bible leaves us open ended when it comes to the after death, there is so much to question. However, God has provided a basic understanding of what is to come, but how much of the unknown is really important to the way we live our lives now? Don’t get me wrong here, this is the basis of our hope in Jesus coming back and eternal life, principalities that are fundamental to the truth of who God is. We believe what is to come; we recognize the importance of eternal life and the need to bring salvation to his children. But how much of it should we continue to ponder on and what good does it do to ponder about the unknown? Should our focus be more on the present coming instead of what I will bring to the new kingdom? Do we need to be preparing for something? Or are we already prepared? When we are anticipating the future there is always action to be taken, just like when a hurricane is approaching the main land, everyone begins to prepare for it, knowing that if they don’t take action now, there is no guarantee of survival. We are anticipating the coming of Christ, are we prepared?
What does knowing more then what we already know have of value? What do we do with all this information? Does it help to reformat the way we think about life in the present? I guess what I am asking is what value does it bring to the present life when we ponder on the unknown future? Or am I just asking the wrong question?
Comment — October 16, 2008 @ 2:44 pm